.NET simplified the numerous complexity with traditional web application development, which is a boon for software and web app developers. With the rise in the demand of .NET development, an organization seeking solutions could tap into the skillsets of some of several .NET application development companies easily.
Organizations need a business oriented tech solutions that will automate, streamline and optimize processes to achieve better performance. The solution so developed also facilitate improved user experience when it comes to accessibility, usability and availability. Dot net development services portfolio integrates industry-centered and technology specific solutions.
Understanding The Varieties Of .Net
Once upon a time, there was this single .NET, known as the .NET framework. To write .NET apps, it only requires targeting the .NET framework, and life was simple. A few years later came the explosion of .NET varieties, but many have become extinct. Either they are no longer supported or no longer updated.
The implementation of .NET, known as the .NET Framework is the original .NET, wherein all others descended. It’s the biggest version of the framework, both in the amount of APIs supported, and in the size of the download. A lot of versions of the framework have been released through the years, each one adding new APIs as well as other features. .NET is developed and supported by Microsoft, and only runs on Windows machines. A .NET development company delivers software solutions using the many solutions and systems of the .NET framework.
Mono is an open-source .NET implementation intended to be compatible with the framework, but runs on various platforms, which include MacOS, Windows and Linux. The Linux was started by enthusiasts who believed that the .NET benefits must be enjoyed on other platforms aside from Windows, and that the best way to accomplish this was via an open-source effort.
The coverage of the .NET APIs of Mono is not complete, but is pretty good. Porting from .NET to mono is fairly easy. Mono still is a viable option for cross-platform efforts.
The .NET Standard is another effort for supporting .NET use across numerous platforms. Unlike, Mono and .NET Framework, it’s not a complete package with a library and runtimes. Instead, it’s a specification of APIs, which should be supported on a .NET implementation, in particular. The intent is that any library implemented for .NET Standard must be able to work in any app created for any of the platforms of .NET. Furthermore, it supports libraries only, not apps, and is designed so that one could write libraries that would work anywhere.
.NET Core is another open-source cross-platform implementation of .NET, stewarded this time by Microsoft from its inception. Also, it supports Windows, Linux and MacOS. .NET Core initially appeared somewhat a lightweight implementation. Powerful enough to support console apps and ASP.NET and not much else. Later, it seemed to expand in order to support a subset of APIs, which could easily be supported on MacOS, Windows and Linux, while leaving out support for things such as the Registry that were Windows-specific.
Brief Note On Tooling
For some time, every .NET variant had its own dedicated development tools. Visual Studio was for .NET, MonoDevelop was for Mono and Visual Studio Code mostly was for .NET Core. Recently, the lines have blurred. Aside from the .NET framework, Visual Studio now could be used to develop for Xamarin, .NET Standard and .NET Core. Visual Studio Core originally was a source code editor, but now it has become a much more complete development environment and could be used for developing on .NET Core or .NET Framework.
Why .Net Matters More Than Ever
The framework is designed to be language neutral, and work with most standard computer languages in most standard operating environments, which include those that have not been created yet, but could be reasonably predicted, at least in terms of core logic issues. In creating the framework and eventually releasing the .NET Framework as open source, Microsoft helped set the stage for the next modern computing evolution.
.NET definitely helped set the stage for the world as we know it through developing an application development platform available on virtually on any personal computer and could handle just about any kind of app development in almost any language. Now, it seems like this is exactly what the world needs. Software that’s built with the .NET technology is safe, the code is closed and compiled. Even though, somehow the source code could up in the wrong hands, the organization’s know-how would not be in danger or compromised.
With .NET in place, staff augmentation is easier, since it’s a standard application framework, which virtually any technology agency knows how to use already. Working with .NET from the start, one could still customize proprietary applications to suit the business as well as the customers. Interoperability, which once was considered as simply a nice thing to have, has become a necessity for survival. If one wants to build an app, and if there is a need for a huge number of people to use that application, then it requires making it accessible across a lot of competing platforms.
The .NET explosion and .NET development services produced plenty of .NET variants, some have been extinct already, while others occupy a very narrow niche, and still others are thriving. The .NETs that are striving are similar enough that developers often are confused when they encounter them, and aren’t sure which one to use. However, choosing between them is pretty straightforward. Use the original .NET when building an app that would only ever run on Windows.
Use Mon for an app to run on many platforms and needs API coverage approaching, which provided by the full .NET Framework. .NET Core is the choice when creating cross-platform apps, which could be built with the somewhat restricted API set of .NET Core. Consider the .NET Standard to make libraries, which could run on NET Framework, Xamarin or .NET Core, and isolate platform-centered parts of the app, such as the UI, in components that are targeted to specific platforms.
.NET and its many variants will continue to be significant this year and in the years to come.